Ferguson Wellman Named a Leader in Corporate Philanthropy

PORTLAND, Ore. – September 23, 2014 – Ferguson Wellman Capital Management has been named by the Portland Business Journal as a leader in corporate philanthropy in Oregon and southwest Washington. Ferguson Wellman was ranked eighth in the medium-sized companies category at the Business Journal’s annual Corporate Philanthropy Awards luncheon. Company submission to the process included number of employees, amount of dollars contributed and number of volunteer hours completed in 2013.

“This is an honor and recognition shared by everyone in our firm. It is gratifying to join other like-minded companies that make this city a better place to live and work,” said Jim Rudd, principal and chief executive officer.

Founded in 1975, Ferguson Wellman Capital Management is a privately owned registered investment advisor, headquartered in the Pacific Northwest. With more than 670 clients in 35 states, the firm manages $4.1 billion. Ferguson Wellman also serves individuals and institutions through West Bearing Investments, a division that manages portfolios with investments of $750,000 or more. (data as of 6/30/14)

###

Onward and Upward

by Shawn Narancich, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

Investors attempted to divine the future of U.S. monetary policy following this week’s Fed meeting and watched with wide eyes as Alibaba became the largest ever U.S. IPO. For investment bankers underwriting shares of Alibaba, the timing of this $22 billion offering couldn’t have been better as U.S. stocks remain well bid amidst record levels of corporate profits and low inflation. Do record levels for U.S. stock prices and a feeding frenzy for the newly traded shares of Alibaba (trading up 36 percent in its debut) indicate speculation and excess, or is the S&P 500 at over 2,000 simply a marker on the path to further gains? Judging by the amount of retail investor cash on the sidelines and what appears to be an accelerating rate of economic growth domestically, we believe that equity valuations are reasonable. Our call is for stocks to track rising earnings and outperform bonds as the Fed pares its program of QE and ultimately starts raising interest rates next year.

Fed Semantics

All of which brings us to the details surrounding Yellen & Co.’s Fed meeting this week. Investors expected QE to be trimmed again, but the question for many investors surrounded the language with which Yellen would describe the timeframe between QE termination and the onset of rate increases. Juxtaposed against another benign inflation reading reported earlier this week (1.7 percent on the CPI), considerable time was retained as the Fed’s operative phrase. And why not? Commodity prices are dropping thanks to the stronger dollar and weaker growth from China, while unit labor costs are well contained at +2 percent. Recognizing that the Fed operates under a dual mandate to limit inflation to 2 percent and promote full employment, the error of estimate seems to be lower in deciding how fast the Fed raises interest rates, acknowledging that the 6.1 percent level of unemployment most likely overstates the degree of labor market tightness because labor force participation is so low. So is the market for Fed Funds futures correct in undershooting the FOMC committee’s collective prediction that short-term rates will rise to 1 3/8 percent by the end of next year? Only time will tell, but we believe that the Fed remains dependent on the tenor of incoming economic data to determine how fast rates will normalize.

Approaching Quarter End

With the Fed meeting behind us, a spattering of odd lot earnings reports this week from the disparate ranks of Fed Ex (good numbers, stock up), General Mills (bad numbers, stock down), and Oracle (disappointing numbers, stock down) has investors beginning to consider what could become of the next earnings parade that will start in just a few short weeks. We see puts and takes. Inasmuch as the U.S. economy is outperforming other regions at the same time the trade-weighted dollar has surged, U.S.-centric companies stand a better chance of meeting and/or exceeding estimates. In contrast, larger multi-nationals could struggle with currency translation and economic headwinds from a moribund European economy and slowing growth in China.

Our Takeaways from the Week

• Stocks remain well bid as investors come to grips with the prospects for Fed tightening next year

• Third quarter earnings season is right around the corner amidst currency headwinds for multi-national corporations

Disclosures

Independence for Scotland and a UK haggis famine

by Brad Houle, CFA Executive Vice President

Haggis is a cuisine of Scotland characterized by Wikipedia as a savory pudding containing sheep's pluck (heart, liver and lungs) minced with onion, oatmeal, suet, spices and salt mixed with stock. It is traditionally encased in the animal's stomach and simmered for approximately three hours.

The often lampooned delicacy was featured in the 1993 film, “So I Married an Axe Murder,” staring Mike Meyers. In the comedy, Mike Meyers’ character of Scottish decent when as asked about his fondness for haggis responded, “I think it's repellent in every way. In fact, I think most Scottish cuisine is based on a dare.”

On September 18, a referendum for Scottish independence from the United Kingdom will be put to a vote. Recently, polls suggest that it will be a close outcome. This situation is creating uncertainty and we have seen the pound sterling weaken as a result. At stake is revenue from the oil-rich North Sea which has been greater than 2 percent of the UK's revenues down from over 6 percent of revenue in the 1980s. The North Sea fields are off the coast of Scotland and there is some question about which country would control the revenue after a split. There have been many comparisons of an independent Scotland and Norway based on the countries similar populations and potential energy wealth. While the North Sea fields are in a period of declining production, the revenue would be material to an independent Scotland.

If a vote for independence passes, the UK's fragile recovery from the financial crisis will be called into question. The UK economy has slowly been crawling out of the economic downturn of the Great Recession in a similar fashion to the U.S. A split-off of Scotland would potentially stall the recovery.

The pending referendum has also created uncertainty relative to business investments in that there is a question about the political landscape should a split occur. In a similar situation, Quebec had a referendum for independence in 1995 that failed. However, the uncertainty that it could occur again was at least partly responsible for an economic malaise in the province and reduced business investment.

In Spain, the region of Catalonia has a referendum in November of 2014 for possible secession.  The impact of this would be negative for Spain as its economy is in far worse shape than the U.S. and the UK.

While not a catastrophe in the making, an independent Scotland or Catalonia destabilizes what is a tenuous recovery in Europe. Most of Continental Europe is suffering from anemic growth, continued high unemployment, massive indebtedness and the specter of deflation.  Above all, the financial markets hate uncertainty and these types of changes are potentially disruptive to the European recovery.

Other Takeaways for the Week

• Apple introduced the iPhone 6, Apple Watch and Apple Pay this week, which were generally well received. The Apple Pay secure transaction using an iPhone rather than a physical credit card has the potential to revolutionize how items are paid for at retailers.
• The late Joan Rivers often used humor regarding her financial life as part of her act. One memorable quote that bears mentioning is, “People say that money is not the key to happiness, but I always figured if you have enough money, you can have a key made.”

Disclosures

InvestmentNews Names Ferguson Wellman Top RIA Firm in Oregon

PORTLAND, Ore. – September 9, 2014 – Ferguson Wellman Capital Management has been named the top registered investment advisory firm in the state of Oregon. For the top RIA list, InvestmentNews qualified the list of firms based on data firms listed in Form ADV to the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2014. Many criteria were considered for the listing. Among them were total assets under management and financial planning services. Also, neither the firm nor its representatives can be actively engaged in business as a representative of a broker-dealer.

“It is always gratifying to be mentioned alongside your peers when it comes to assets under management and percentage gained year-over-year. Equally important to us is the trusting relationships we have earned with each of our clients. After all, it is their assets that have allowed us to be mentioned in the first place,” said James H. Rudd, principal and chief executive officer.

Founded in 1975, Ferguson Wellman Capital Management is a privately owned registered investment adviser that serves over 650 clients with assets starting at $3 million. The firm works with individuals and institutions in 35 states with a concentration of those clients in the West. Ferguson Wellman manages $4 billion that comprises union and corporate retirement plans; endowments and foundations; and separately managed accounts for individuals and families. In 2013, West Bearing Investments was established, a division of Ferguson Wellman, that serves clients with assets starting at $750,000. All company information listed above reflects 6/30/14 data.

###

Methodology: InvestmentNews qualified 1,442 firms headquartered in the United States based on data reported on Form ADV to the Securities and Exchange Commission as of May 1, 2014. To qualify, firms must have met the following criteria: (1) latest ADV filing date is either on or after Jan. 1 (2) total AUM is at least $100M, (3) does not have employees who are registered representatives of a broker-dealer, (4) provided investment advisory services to clients during the most recently completed fiscal year, (5) no more than 50% of regulatory assets under management is attributable to pooled investment vehicles (other than investment companies), (6) no more than 25% of amount of regulatory assets under management is attributable to pension and profit-sharing plans (but not the plan participants), (7) no more than 25% of amount of regulatory assets under management is attributable to corporations or other businesses, (8) does not receive commissions, (9) provides financial planning services, (10) is not actively engaged in business as a broker-dealer (registered or unregistered), (11) is not actively engaged in business as a registered representative of a broker-dealer, (12) has neither a related person who is a broker-dealer/municipal securities dealer/government securities broker or dealer (registered or unregistered) nor one who is an insurance company or agency.

Visit data.InvestmentNews.com/RIA for more complete profiles and financials.

Somebody’s Watching Me

by Jason Norris, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

There were two high profile data breaches this week which highlighted the importance of cyber security, as well as “implied privacy.” Home Depot announced that they had a breach where credit and debit cards used at its stores may have been compromised. Initial speculation was that this may have just happened within the last few weeks; however, some reports indicate the breach may extend back to April of 2014. There were also reports from Goodwill, Dairy Queen and Supervalu that some of their locations may have experienced a data breach. What this shines a light on is the importance of corporate security, as well as vigilant consumers. One potential solution to this problem would be the implementation of “chip and pin” debit/credit cards. Most of the world has already implemented this means of transaction, but the U.S. has not. The main difference between “chip and pin” cards and standard debit cards is, when using a chip card, there is no magnetic strip to swipe. The card is put in a Point of Sale (POS) terminal, the chip is read, and the consumer has to input a PIN number. The security for these transactions is much more reliable. The chip cannot be copied like a magnetic strip can (as we saw in the Target case, and it looks like the Home Depot breach as well.) Visa and MasterCard are big proponents of this technology; however, it has been very slow to roll out in the U.S. The Netherlands company NXP Semiconductor is a key player in the technology for these cards.

The distribution of several celebrities’ nude pictures this week has also highlighted the importance of personal cyber security. Over the weekend, more than 100 personal iCloud accounts were hacked and private photos were leaked to the media, with several prominent actresses being victimized. Apparently, this was a case of hackers easily decoding individuals’ passwords. While this action is not condoned, individuals have to remember that any material that is stored in the cloud runs the risk of being compromised.

Less Than Zero

The European Central Bank continued to take rates lower this week by reducing its deposit rate to -0.2 percent from -0.1 percent. You are reading that correctly, that is a negative number. This seems to be more symbolic, rather than having much of an impact on the market. The market impact decision came in the same announcement that the ECB will increase its purchase of ABS (Asset-Backed Securities). This is very similar to what the U.S. Fed had been doing with its purchase of mortgage-backed securities. The key item missing is that the ECB did not announce a plan to purchase sovereign debt. The ECB is hoping banks will sell their ABS to them and in its place, make loans. Europe continues to sputter out of recession with expectations of GDP growth and inflation below 1 percent. This move by the ECB showed the market that it is willing to support European economies, although one has to wonder if they have enough power to do so.

Why Worry

The employment report this morning was a disappointment with the U.S. only adding 142,000 jobs in the month of August; expectations were for over 200,000.  Ferguson Wellman believes this data will eventually be revised upward.  The economic data the last few months has been very robust and is not consistent with this weak jobs number.  Therefore, we aren’t concerned about the number unless other economic data starts to signal a slowdown.

Gameday

With the Seattle Seahawks opening game win Thursday, it reminds us of the Super Bowl stock market prediction. Some may recall when we highlighted the belief that if the Seattle Seahawks won the Super Bowl this year it would foretell a positive year to the market. So far so good with a 9 percent+ gain in the S&P 500 to date. Even with this strong run, we believe that earnings growth and low inflation will continue to be tailwinds for equities, pushing them higher to year-end.

Our Takeaways for the Week

• Internet security will become more of a focus for companies and individuals
• Global central banks are supporting economies - coupled with strong earnings, this is a positive for stocks

Disclosures

The Last Days of Summer

by Ralph Cole, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

Stronger The U.S. economy was indeed stronger than first reported in the second quarter as estimates were revised higher this week when the commerce department reported that the U.S. economy grew 4.2 percent during the quarter. This pace fits with our narrative that the U.S. economy is truly getting healthier, particularly in the aftermath of a very harsh winter.

In fact, there was a lot to like about most of the economic reports this week. For example, durable goods orders grew 22 percent, led by airplanes; unemployment claims came in again under the 300,000 mark - yet another example of vitality in the labor markets; auto sales for the month of July were robust at over a 16 million annual rate of sales. In summary, current economic statistics suggest a sustainable expansion with moderate inflation.

Witchcraft Black magic may be the only explanation for ultra-low interest rates in the face of sound economic numbers. Our industry heuristic states that strong economic growth ultimately must translate into higher interest rates. Not so fast my friend. While the U.S. economy is growing quite nicely, Europe is suffering from falling growth rates, and plunging inflation which has contributed to record lows in interest rates throughout the Eurozone. For example, Germany’s 10-year bund fell to a .88 percent yield while 10-year debt yields touched 1.24 percent in France and hit a 2.22 percent in Italy. With European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi’s most recent speech in Jackson Hole last week, he essentially took perceived credit risk off the table for the Eurozone. With a compelling endorsement of U.S. style quantitative easing on the horizon, investors clearly are (for the time being) comfortable holding European debt.

Lower rates throughout the Eurozone have effectively put a bid under U.S. bonds. In the global market for debt, savers view U.S. debt as a good deal at these levels and continue to buy. Studies estimate that the downward pressure on U.S. rates from lower European rates is anywhere from 20–30 basis points. As you can see from the chart below, U.S. 10-year yields are at their outer-bounds relative to the yield on the 10-year German bund.

Our Takeaways for the Week

• The U.S. economic expansion has taken hold, and looks to be sustainable throughout the second half of 2014
• Lower interest rates around the world and continued quantitative easing by the Fed has kept a lid on interest rates … for now
• The end of summer brings the anticipation of football season, and the end to QE infinity

Disclosures

Ferguson Wellman's Monthly Blog for Oregon Business

Read the blog authored by Ferguson Wellman's Jason Norris @OregonBusiness. http://ow.ly/AI8NU Disclosures: http://ow.ly/AI8P2

The Talking Heads

by Shawn Narancich, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

A good indicator of financial markets adjusting to a slower rate of news flow is the frequency with which the same stories are replayed and debated in the financial press and on television. With retailers now wrapping up second quarter earnings season, Wall Street strategists and commentators have resorted to debating ad nauseum what will happen to short-term interest rates once the Fed ends its program of quantitative easing. Minutes of the latest Fed meeting this week revealed that the Fed will remain data dependent, letting incoming economic reports and anecdotal Beige Book reports tell the story of progress for the economy in general and for the labor markets and inflation in particular.

On the latter topic, policy makers received reassurance this week that inflation is not presently a problem, as headline CPI numbers came in spot-on with the Fed’s 2.0 percent target. Tame inflation indicates that labor markets, absent select areas in energy and manufacturing, still contain the sufficient slack necessary to boost output without spurring a wage spiral. As the old saw says, time will tell. In the meantime, investors seem to be tuning out the chatter as they bid equities to new record highs.

Like Sands Through the Hour Glass. . .

Believe it or not, we’re now halfway through the third quarter and, once again, the error of estimates appears to be on the downside with regard to economic growth forecasts. While this week’s housing statistics were encouraging, with July new housing starts up 16 percent sequentially, a key fly in the ointment was last week’s retail sales report, which came in flat with June numbers and continued a disappointing trend of sequentially slowing retail sales since May. At a time when international headwinds are increasing thanks to Europe teetering just above stall speed and China continuing to undergo a growth-slowing transition away from excessive investment, our forecast for 3 percent GDP growth domestically is starting to feel just a bit optimistic.

Ka-Ching!

As tempting as it might have been to write-off last week’s poor retail sales report as a statistical anomaly when juxtaposed against increasingly positive employment numbers, considerable anecdotal evidence from retailers reporting fiscal second quarter numbers affirms the data. Two key bellwethers of American retailing – Wal-Mart and Target – both reported earnings declines on moribund U.S. sales, and investors have consistently overestimated the companies’ earnings power over the past six months. In addition, Macy’s surprised investors by uncharacteristically missing numbers and lowering sales guidance. Alas, this week brought some better news on the retailing front, with Home Depot reporting strong sales and earnings coupled with a boost to their full year earnings forecast. In contrast to the drubbing that Macy’s took, stock of the home improvement leader broke out to new all-time highs. Similarly, off-price merchandisers T.J. Maxx and Ross Stores both outperformed Wall Street expectations and were accordingly rewarded by investors. With retail earnings reports nearly wrapped up for the quarter, we observe that results are hit and miss, and that investors are best served to take a rifle shot approach to owning specific names advantaged by key trends in retail.

Our Takeaways from the Week

• Stock prices remain resilient despite mixed economic data and geopolitical turmoil globally
• Retailers are book-ending another quarter of better-than-expected earnings in general, though one with more cross-currents below the surface

Disclosures

Sanford and Son: Bonds Hit a Rough Patch

by Brad Houle, CFA Executive Vice President

Sanford and Son was a TV series in the 1970s about a disagreeable junk dealer and his adult son. In one reoccurring gag in the series the main character, Fred Sanford, would dramatically grab his chest and exclaim, "Oooo….It’s the big one….You hear that, Elizabeth… I'm comin' to you."  This simulated heart attack was perpetrated by the Fred Sanford character to make his point when exasperated and was always a false alarm. Recently, the junk bond market hit a rough patch with investors exiting junk bond funds, causing bond prices to decline. The question at hand is, is this correction "the Big One," meaning a new credit crisis, or simply a minor correction akin to the dramatic fake heart attack that Fred Sanford used to torture the other characters on the show?

Bonds that are below investment grade are often referred to as junk bonds due to the lower credit quality of the companies issuing the bonds. Junk bond is somewhat of a pejorative description of an important part of the bond market. Small companies that are growing, which is a large engine for the U.S. economy, often fit into the category of below investment grade credit. It is important that there are public market debt financing options available for these entities. Because of the lower credit quality, investors demand more compensation in the form of interest in order to loan these companies money. Also due to the lower credit quality, there is a higher potential default risk for these bonds.

Recently, there has been an outflow of money from high yield bond funds as investors have become nervous about the risks of below investment grade bonds. With interest rates being so low for an extended period of time, the hunt for yield by investors has been intense. Money has been flowing into the type of investments that can offer a higher income than the traditional bond market. Below investment grade bonds have been one of the asset classes that has benefitted from this cash flow. As a result, the prices of high yield bonds have been bid up and the resulting yields are down because they move inversely to one another.

The higher the risk in a bond, the higher the yield should be to compensate for the risk. The way risk is measured in high yield bonds is the yield spread over U.S. Treasury bonds. Bonds issued with the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government are considered to be riskless with respect to default. High yield bonds can default and, as a result, investors receive additional interest over a treasury bond to compensate for that risk. For example, if a U.S. 10-year Treasury bond is yielding 3 percent, a high yield bond should yield 8 percent, given the historical relationship. Traditionally, the average spread between high yield bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds is 5 percent. With the insatiable demand for income, high yield bond prices have risen to a point where investors are only getting 3 percent more interest than treasury bonds.

Our view is that this is a normal correction that has more to do with the recent stock market volatility than credit quality. The high yield market is often more closely correlated with the stock market as opposed to the bond market.  On average, the underlying credit quality of high yield bonds is better than average as evidenced by the default rate. According to Standard & Poor’s, the default rate on high yield bonds has recently been around 2 percent, well below the long-term average of just over 4 percent.

With the strong demand for high yield bonds, the valuation probably did get extended; however, we don't believe this is the start of another credit crisis.

Our Takeaway for the Week

• Geopolitical events continue to drive equity and bond market volatility

Disclosures

Summertime Blues

by Jason Norris, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

Recent weakness in the S&P 500 has led to a lot of chatter regarding the inevitable pullback in equities. While the last few weeks have exhibited some weakness, stocks are still up close to 5 percent, year-to-date. While the United States continues to show improving growth, as seen in recent jobless claims and the Purchasing Managers Index (PMI), global political affairs have wound the markets tight. Russia continues to make noise in the Ukraine while the Middle East is demonstrating that nothing has (nor will) changed for decades. This uncertainty coupled with growth concerns in both China and Europe has led to a rally in bonds as well as a minor sell-off in equities.

The 10-year Treasury now yields just above 2.4 percent, which is the lowest in over a year, as global investors flock to the U.S. dollar and park cash in “risk free” assets. This flow of funds has resulted in weakness in equities. U.S. equities are down close to 4 percent from recent highs which have led to some talking heads focusing on an impending sell-off. However, these 2 to 5 percent pullbacks are normal in bull markets. For instance, over the last 30 months, we have seen nine 2+ percent pullbacks, but the S&P 500 is up over 60 percent in that period. What we continue to watch is improvement in the U.S. economy, growing corporate revenues and reasonable valuation. The current environment is favorable for all of those.

Messin’ with a Hurricane

This week brought the first hurricane to the Hawaiian Islands in 22 years, as well as a “storm of headlines” regarding U.S. companies relocating offshore. The equity market was not too happy with Walgreens’ decision earlier this week not to seek a “tax inversion” with its pending acquisition of Alliance Boots in Switzerland. While domiciling in Switzerland would have saved Walgreens billions of dollars in tax expenses, the company decided stay committed to the state of Illinois. There is speculation that the Obama administration’s use of the bully pulpit was a key factor in management’s decision to continue to pay higher taxes. We believe that an inversion would be more difficult for Walgreens to pull off since most of their revenues are generated in the U.S., thus no offshore cash to repatriate. On the other hand, companies like Abbvie and Medtronic have meaningful amounts of international business, thus their “inversion” acquisitions (Shire and Covidian, respectively) would be easier to justify.

What this recent trend highlights is the need to restructure the U.S. tax code so companies can be more competitive globally. While many of these deals may still be pursued, the tax savings is a key attribute in the overall structure. What can’t get lost in the noise is that although U.S. companies may change their mailing address, they will still bring their offshore cash back to the U.S. and reinvest domestically. With a mid-term election this year, major tax reform may not happen at least until 2015, and possibly not until after the 2016 presidential election.

Too High to Fly

A few weeks ago, the state of Washington started selling recreational marijuana which coincided with the cracking of the high-yield bubble. High-yield bonds have been a strong performer over the last several years; however, like stocks, the month of July hasn’t been friendly to the high-yield market. Spreads have started to increase in the face of lower Treasury yields. This culminated with over $7 billion exiting high-yield funds last week. We don’t believe this is a “canary in the coal mine” with respect to corporate America; however, we are watching it closely. High-yield bonds are trading at historically tight levels, just over 3 percent above Treasury yields, as investors seek income. The long-term average spread has been close to 6 percent higher than Treasuries. Therefore, we would not be surprised if that market continues to show poor performance as we revert back to the mean. While, there are times we may venture into lower rated bonds, we believe that the market as a whole is a bit rich and would wait for spreads to widen further before we allocate additional capital.

Our Takeaways for the Week

• Minor equity pullbacks are common and investors need to stay focuses on the fundamentals
• While July saw a “risk-off” market, we still believe equities will outperform bonds for the rest of 2014

Disclosures

Lazy Hazy Crazy Days

by Ralph Cole, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

Although this time of year is often described as the summer doldrums, that certainly was not the case this week. Earnings, the Fed and economic data dominated the tape … and made for interesting market activity.

All Along the Watchtower

Fed-watching during a time of taper is an essential part of managing money these days. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced on Wednesday that they would continue to taper their purchases of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities by an additional $5 billion each this month. The Fed continues on pace to stop all security purchases by October. While they made mention that there is still slack in the labor market, the Fed must be comforted by the consistency of job growth in 2014. The U.S. has added an average of 230,000 jobs per month this year versus 194,000 per month in 2013. Commentary after their two-day meeting continues to signal that they are on pace to begin raising rates in the middle of 2015.

Too Hot?

The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that U.S. GDP grew 4 percent during the second quarter. This robust growth and some of the comments by the Fed may have spooked investors this week into thinking that the Fed will raise rates sooner than expected. We believe this was more of an excuse for a sell off rather than a good reason for selling stocks. There will be volatility in the stock market as we move into next year and the Fed communicates their outlook. In the end, we believe that they will be raising rates for the right reasons … the economy is getting better and extraordinary stimulus is no longer needed.

Upside Down

Earnings season is always one of the more volatile times of the quarter. While earnings have come in very strong (7.7 percent growth up to this point), seemingly minor misses are punished unmercilessly. The healthcare sector has provided the biggest positive surprise for the quarter. Thus far, healthcare companies have reported 14.8 percent growth. On the other end of the spectrum, consumer discretionary companies have only reported 2.9 percent earnings growth.

Our Takeaways for the Week

• Focus on the Fed will continue to cause volatility in the market in the coming months. We believe it is more important to focus on the overall trajectory of the economy to determine direction of the stock market
• Companies continue to grow earnings at an impressive rate despite sub-par global growth

Disclosures

Brad Houle Article in Portland Business Journal

Brad Houle, CFA, executive vice president of research, recently authored a by-line article that was included in the Portland Business Journal’s 2014 Wealth Management and Financial Services Guide. This publication is sponsored annually by the CFA Society of Portland.

In the article, Houle states, “While bonds do not offer a compelling value at this point, they are a necessary component of many portfolios for both individual and institutional investors.” Houle is a member of Ferguson Wellman’s fixed income team and manages the firm’s REIT investment strategy.

Click here to read “A yield austerity; how not to get burned in the bond market.”

Disclosures

Full Speed Ahead

by Shawn Narancich, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

 Unexpected Returns

Despite serious turmoil in the Middle East and ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, blue-chip stocks have pushed to new record highs amid upbeat quarterly earnings and encouraging economic data. As Wall Street frets about why interest rates are so low, investors are also enjoying what has turned into a nice coupon-plus return environment for bonds this year, one that could continue to confound those expecting higher rates. Indeed, the CPI report out this week provides evidence that a 2.1 percent inflation rate may trend lower over the next few months if commodity prices continue to moderate.

Gasoline prices accounted for two-thirds of the June index increase, and with pump prices now on their way back down, consumers should expect to get a break at the pump and investors a break on headline inflation. Just as important, natural gas prices have fallen precipitously in the past month due to better-than-expected storage refills and grain prices falling under the expectation of record harvests this fall. With wage gains remaining muted and investment-grade bond yields at surprisingly low levels in Europe, bond investors expecting materially higher rates could be surprised by a rate environment that stays lower for longer. We see an environment of muted inflation and accelerating U.S. economic gains creating a profitable backdrop for equity investors.

A Jobs Renaissance?

Supporting the notion of improving economic fundamentals was this week’s jobless claims number, which breached the psychologically important 300,000 level to the downside. U.S. claims trickled in at a rate of just 284,000 in the past week, a level investors haven’t witnessed in over eight years. This bullish claims number and the downward trending four-week moving average lend credence to the strong payroll numbers reported in June, while increasing our confidence that July’s report will be another good one.

Holy Chipotle!

As more people find work, consumption spending should increase, but as the results from McDonalds and its former subsidiary Chipotle Mexican Grill showed this week, where consumers choose to spend their new-found incomes can be as different as, well, burgers and burritos. McDonalds disappointed by reporting falling same-store sales, but Chipotle announced a 17.3 percent surge, the likes of which it hasn’t seen since 2006. Store traffic at the Golden Arches has lagged and McDonald’s contends with a lower income demographic for which pricing is always an issue. In contrast, Chipotle’s higher income constituents are more likely to accept occasional menu price hikes as they did in the second quarter, without chasing away customers. Indeed, Chipotle benefitted from a trifecta of good fortune – higher prices, better mix, and more store traffic that collectively produced 24 percent earnings growth. On much better-than-expected sales and earnings, Chipotle’s stock surged 12 percent while McDonalds’ shares fell 1 percent.

With about half of the S&P 500 having reported second quarter results, approximately 75 percent of companies are delivering better-than-expected earnings, and 65 percent are also besting top-line estimates. As a result, earnings projections for the benchmark index that a month ago predicted 4 percent growth for the quarter now stand at 6 percent.

Our Takeaways from the Week

• Despite stiff geopolitical headwinds, U.S. stocks continue to forge new highs
• A majority of companies reporting so far are delivering better than expected second quarter sales and earnings

Disclosures

Jason Norris Discusses Microsoft Restructuring on KGW

Jason Norris, CFA, spoke with KGW’s Joe Smith to share his thoughts on the impact of Microsoft’s restructuring from an investor’s perspective.  Please click here to see the video.

Take Me to the Top

by Jason Norris, CFA Executive Vice President of Research

Take Me to the Top

The most common question we have been getting as of late is when is the market pullback going to occur? Stocks are up over to 200 percent from the March 2009 bottom and 75 percent from the most recent market correction (of 15 percent) in October 2011. While it has been almost three years since a major correction, history has shown this trend can continue for quite a bit longer. To that point, Cornerstone Macro Research gathered some data on previous market pullbacks which are highlighted in the chart below.

History shows that there have been numerous periods of much longer durations when stocks have climbed without a major pullback. If you simply look at the fundamentals of the stock market, an argument can be made that the S&P 500 can continue to move higher without a meaningful pullback. First, U.S. economic growth is improving and global GDP should continue to trend in the mid-single digits, resulting in continued earnings growth. Second, with low inflation and low interest rates, the valuation of the equity market is still attractive and the Price-to-Earnings multiple of the S&P 500 still has room for upside from 15.6x at present. While there will always be unforeseen shocks, the risks in the system are not as predominate as we saw in 2011 (Europe debt crisis, U.S. debt downgrade, Fiscal austerity) or 2000 (stretched valuation, falling consumer sentiment, manufacturing data weakening). However, risks that investors should be cognizant of are a spike in oil prices due to Middle East tensions, China’s economic growth slowing meaningfully, and an adverse reaction to Federal interest rate hikes in 2015.

What Do You Do For Money?

Earnings kicked off this week with mixed results from large cap technology. Specifically, there was divergence within the internet ad space, with Google growing and Yahoo stagnant. One wonders how long the Yahoo board will give CEO Marissa Mayer to achieve the turnaround. Intel delivered a strong quarter due to PC upgrades primarily from businesses as Microsoft sunsets its client support for Windows XP. This strength is allowing the company to return cash to shareholders through an announced $20 billion repurchase plan. While Intel stock reacted very favorably to the announcement, it was disconcerting that their mobile business continues to underachieve. This division lost over $1 billion while grossing a mere $51 million in revenue (down from $292 million a year ago). Intel’s move into this area looks to have been a failure which leads us to speculate where they will have to make an acquisition in order to penetrate the market.

Takeaways for the Week

• The start of the earnings season has resulted in no major market moving results
• Tensions in the Middle East and Ukraine may have a minor effect on U.S. markets, and unless we see a spike in oil, they should not hinder economic growth

 Disclosures

Investment Outlook Video: Third Quarter 2014

We are pleased to present our Investment Outlook: Third Quarter 2014 video titled, "Back on Track." This quarter, Chief Investment Officer George Hosfield, CFA, discusses how despite starting the year with a winter-induced swoon, the equity markets have nearly realized the “average annual return” that we predicted in January for the entire year. That said, we believe that an improving labor market, a strengthening economy, rising earnings, low interest rates and reasonable multiples provide a backdrop for further equity gains.

To view our Investment Outlook video, please click here or click on the image below.

jpeg of Q3 2014 Outlook video for email hyperlink

Sovereign Debt Risk in Europe Takes a Holiday

by Brad Houle, CFA Executive Vice President

We have illustrated below the details of the convergence of government bond yields between the stronger credits of Germany and the United States versus the weaker credits of Italy and Spain. Germany and the United States are arguably two of the strongest sovereign bond insurers in the world. While not perfect, both Germany and the United States have dynamic economies with reasonable levels of inflation versus economic growth. Also, both countries have excellent ability to pay their debts and are viewed as "safe haven" credits by bond investors.

Italy and Spain are a different matter. While we do believe that these countries are starting to recover from the European debt crisis, there are still many structural economic issues that need to be addressed. For example, Italy has a 12 percent unemployment compared to the six percent unemployment in the United States. However, Italy's unemployment looks very favorable compared to the 25 percent unemployment currently in Spain. In addition, both of these countries have severe demographic issues with aging populations and strict labor market regulations that make the labor force less flexible.

What changed to cause interest rates to drop from around the seven percent for a 10-year bond for Spain and Italy in 2021 to the less than three percent rate of interest they now pay were the actions by the European Central Bank or ECB. Essentially, the ECB, which is akin to the Federal Reserve for Europe, announced they would do whatever it takes to backstop these countries. These words gave bond investors the confidence that Italy and Spain will have the ability to honor their debt obligations. Financial markets run on confidence, and this was enough to cut the borrowing costs of these countries by half.

Countries compete for capital from investors. Investors strive to get the best return for the risk that they are taking. Given this set of facts, buying United States treasury bonds versus European country debt seems like a much better investment from a risk versus reward standpoint. While the words of the ECB do merit more investor confidence, there is still underlying credit risk that does not seem to be properly priced into European government debt.

This week there was an event in Portugal that highlighted this risk. During the European debt crisis, Portugal was in a similar position to Italy and Spain. Portugal had a heavily indebted economy with structural economic issues and a high cost of borrowing based on perceived credit risk. Portugal fell under the ECB umbrella and their borrowing costs have declined in a similar fashion to Spain and Italy. However, this week Portugal's Banco Espirito Santo announced that they were having issues meeting debt payments on some short-term borrowing the bank had done to fund operations. This news was enough to cause a one day .30 percent increase in the yield of the Portuguese 10-year bond and a broader decline in European stock markets. While relatively minor, this incident demonstrates the market confidence in European sovereign debt markets is on the razor's edge and credit risk is probably not properly reflected in the possible risk of this debt.

Our Takeaways for the Week

• U.S. Treasury debt is more attractive than European sovereign debt

• While we do believe interest rates will rise in the U.S. as economic growth continues, there is a cap on how high interest rates will climb. Investors will favor U.S. Treasury bonds over European bonds which will help keep rising rates in check

Disclosures

2014 Q2 Market Letter

Please click here to find our Market Letter Second Quarter 2014. We hope you find our economic insights interesting and informative.